Among automatically-detected pronunciation errors, seven samples for /h/ in [yoNhoN], /k/ in [saNkai], /p/ in [saNpuN] are assured to be errors by all five human raters as shown with a dotted line in Table 3.4. For the remaining errors, their judgements were ambiguous. No mispronunciation was found in ichi+compounds, which is contrary to our expectations. It may be because most of non-native learners memorize well this first-beginning irregularity.
SYM NATIVE A B C D E
F G H iqpoN -27.47 -28.14 -26.86 -24.69 -27.91 -26.86
-28.78 -25.16 -27.55
nihoN -26.37 -33.51 -28.89 -24.98 -26.50 -28.89
-26.98 -25.10 -25.94
saNboN -26.48 -28.12 -26.84 -25.35 -27.81 -26.84
-25.83 -27.10 -24.46
yoNhoN -26.55 -30.26 -27.30 -30.66 -25.55
-27.30 -25.75 -26.44 -24.60
gohoN -26.20 -28.14 -27.76 -26.95 -26.46 -27.76
-24.28 -25.61 -25.03 iqkai -27.02 -28.31 -28.74 -26.57 -27.82 -28.73
-27.78 -28.19 -27.88
nikai -27.81 -33.35 -27.67 -27.18 -27.84 -26.62
-26.10 -25.46 -24.22
saNkai -25.03 -31.36 -29.84 -28.56 -32.29
-28.19 -28.21 -26.79 -25.96
yoNkai -25.34 -28.79 -31.68 -28.48 -26.40
-29.13 -26.45 -26.94 -25.41
gokai -26.16 -27.57 -30.64 -26.26 -26.63 -27.89
-24.91 -25.50 -25.98 iqpuN -25.77 -28.02 -25.02 -26.22 -26.97 -26.95
-26.13 -26.75 -24.79
nihuN -27.96 -27.96 -26.21 -26.13 -26.45 -26.10
-26.53 -27.08 -25.02
saNpuN -24.22 -27.81 -26.48 -27.21 -26.03 -29.52
-23.85 -30.30 -24.77
yoNhuN -26.43 -27.35 -27.41 -27.49 -26.77 -27.37
-28.40 -27.56 -25.15
gohuN -26.88 -24.54 -25.46 -26.60 -24.79 -27.60
-27.91 -26.34 -23.86
The use of the absolute threshold function on phoneme score was of little use, as the result showed. However, we found that the automatic scoring based on HMM likelihood score correlated well with human perception.